Some myths exploded

8 things people apparently believe, and that are not, in fact, true:

1. Sigarette butts magically disappear when thrown or dropped.
2. The closer you stand to the person in front of you in a queue, the sooner it will be your turn.
3. Anyone who holds the door open for you actually enjoys being a doorstop and there is therefore no need to thank them or even acknowledge their presence.
4. Using someone’s name repeatedly when talking to them denotes sincerity.
5. If you don’t feel drunk, you’re perfectly sober, and therefore able to drive a car and to make rational decisions.
6. A mobile phone makes you more interesting.
7. If you’re on a bike, the highway code does not apply to you and in the event of a collision the person in the car will come off worse.
8. A person in slightly grubby clothes who comes into your shop obviously has no money, and so does not need to be treated as a potential customer.

A couple of notes:
Re: 2 – This may be true in some instances; if you make the person in front of you uncomfortable enough, (s)he may leave.
Re: 4 – This practice freaks me out. If you want to sell me something, don’t use my name more than once or twice.
Addendum re: 7 – For bike, read: bicycle, you know, the kind with pedals rather than a motor. Though to a certain extent the point I’m trying to make appplies to a lot of people on motorbikes, it was occasioned by the fact that I am the only cyclist in Oslo who actually stops at red lights. Seriously. Also, I overheard someone on the bus yesterday advising someone else that you’re “supposed to run the lights” when you’re cycling. “Supposed to”? Well, yes, if your aim is to commit suicide in a rather really messy way, I guess.

To be continued…

Getting carried away at auction

Yesterday I spent three hours in a hot and stuffy room watching people buy crap. Well, a few people bought non-crap, including myself (a completely unbiased assessment, obviously). But people were paying serious money for crap. I wonder if maybe I should get into the amateur antiques trade?

Preamble: Saturday I went to a jumble sale at Manglerud school. I bought a couple of good books. I also had a look over the stuff they’d put aside for Sunday’s auction. Most jumble sales organisers in Oslo do auctions now. It’s probably a good idea, as it means they get whatever people are actually willing to pay for an item in a bidding contest rather than whatever the organisers think they can get away with charging. I saw something I wanted, so I figured I’d go back. Nice relaxing way of spending a Sunday afternoon. Yeah, right.

There were a few of unexpected bidding wars yesterday, one spectacular one, a couple that I watched in amazed silence (careful not to wave my hand about too much) and one partly occasioned by myself. A glass serving plate from the first half of the 20th century (30ies? 40ies? 50ies? The sort of thing my grandmothers had, anyway), which was pink, and, I thought, magnificently ugly, started at 50 nok but as at least three people wanted it badly it was sold for 410. A small oil painting was the source of the spectacular bidding war. Approximately 30×25 centimetres, depicting a pair of kittens. Very cute, I’m sure, and signed, but not with a name I’ve ever heard (which doesn’t necessarily exclude the possibility that (s)he frequently fetches high prices at auction). More importantly, to my mind, though a realist painting in the “looks like a photograph” genre, it wasn’t all that good (i.e. it didn’t actually look like a photograph). But what do I know? Not a lot, obviously: The auctioneer started it at a couple of hundred. It reached 3200. So maybe the painter’s name was one I should have recognised? Or maybe there were two mad cat-effect collectors in the audience. Who knows?

I got what I was there for, though I noticed some people were as surprised at my interest as I was at the lady who purchased the pink plate. Incidentally, I had to pay excactly the same amount for my lot, but at least I got more than one item. 25, in fact. The auctioneer called it a supplementing service, which is accurate enough. 25 parts, 5 soup plates, 5 dessert plates, 5 egg cups, 2 large plates, 1 cream jug, 1 small bowl and 6 saucers of a 70ies (? I really need to find out) service from Stavanger Flint called Flamingo. My brother and I have both started collecting bits and pieces of services from this period, I’m concentrating on two patterns (or trying to concentrate), and it’s quite a lot of fun trying to piece together a service this way rather than buying a new one from Wedgewood. Besides, I like the patterns – they’re much more fun than the average pattern found nowadays. I have yet to figure out why this one is called Flamingo, though.

I got the picture from qxl – as you can see it’s got fishes and an indeterminable something, but no Flamingo, and (more importantly) no pink. I had hoped I would be the only one interested, unfortunately I wasn’t. A couple of other services went for much less (and much less than they were worth) earlier on. A pity I’m not collecting those, really. One of them was a coffee service for twelve from Porsgrund Porselen from the 30ies, there was no interest at the starting price of 200 nok, I think it went for 160 in the end. At that point I was holding on to my money, not knowing how high I’d have to go to get the lot I wanted, or I might have bought it myself and tried selling it on qxl. Similarly, another couple of lots went for ridiculously low prices. Unfortunately, as I said, someone else was interested in my lot. A dealer, probably (judging from the number of lots she’d purchased earlier on) – these things are catching on as collectors’ items (nostalgia kicking in for the population in general), but a quick estimate prior to the auction had told me that 400 would be dirt cheap. I’d have gone further if I’d had to, but I’d only brought 600 in cash (sensible precaution), so I would have had to stop there.

Bidding at auction, of course, is adrenaline-kickville deluxe. Getting carried away is easy. The “this is how much cash I brought so this is how much I can spend” rule is good. I really think I should avoid “proper” auctions (the kind where, cruicially, you can pay by card) like the plague. Besides, at a jumble sale you probably still have more of a chance of carrying off a bargain, though people are obviously wising up to them.

I did actually buy one item that I’ve put up on qxl straight away, just to see if I could get a profit. I’ll fill you in on progress (if there is any). In retrospect, I realise I should have bid on another lot, a book that went for 80, and was probably worth 10 times that. Bummer. Hindsight is 20/20, or so I’m told.

Currency guide: 1 USD = 7.60 NOK, 1 GBP = 11.60 NOK (for others, check Bloomberg)

Sound of the moment: I am 16, Going on 17 (from Sound of Music)
Age of the moment: 13 (hey, I’ve grown!)

Geek?

I’ve been laughed at twice (I asked for it the second time) in recent weeks for knowing the “English books” and “Norwegian books” identifier part of an ISBN number without checking. I also know the identifier for the Norwegian book clubs (De Norske Bokklubbene). If you’ve typed it enough times it sort of sinks in, and there’s a field for ISBN in my book cataloguing software.

I’ve got a longish post coming (to make up for the weekend draught), but I’m off to IKEA now – the catalogue still hasn’t arrived in my mailbox. If you want something you have to go get it yourself, obviously. Hm. Wonder if L is home…

Sound of the moment: Always Look on the Bright Side of Life
Age of the moment: 7

The good, the bad and the not so very pretty

Course continues, and headache is redeveloping, but today I brought Ibuprophen. Yay me.

L is back! Whoohoo! (Ok you guys probably didn’t know, because I don’t think I’ve mentioned it, but she’s been on holiday for weeks and been sorely missed – I can finally follow my impulse to phone L with an actual phone call instead of following it with a sinking feeling remembering she is out of reach.)

Her luggage, however, is not back. Neither is her friend, L2’s. It disappeared at some point between, as far as I can gather, Palermo and Oslo. Here’s to hoping it’s just gone on a bit of a wild trip to Kualalumpur or something, and that it shows up. Though getting the money back on insurance is a good excuse for a major shopping spree, have you ever considered how inadequate the “replacement cost price” really is for a wardrobe that’s been built up over years? If you’re just a little bit picky over clothes, in losing your suitcase like that you’re bound to lose some favourite pieces of clothing (that t-shirt that just perfectly matches your eyes, that one pair of trousers that actually look good and are comfy simultaneously). So crossing my fingers that the rougue bags have not been stolen.

In any case, I’m celebrating her return by going for a visit next weekend (30th-1st). L will be in the process of moving in in Arvika, Sweden, where she’ll be starting work at the hospital. Cider will be consumed (they have cider in Sweden – and I’m talking about English cider, not Swedish, though, naturally, they have the latter, too). Fun will be had. Whisky will be purchased for the next NMWL meeting (which means I have to figure out how to declare stuff when taking the train across the border – no customs’ booth on the train, so how?).

Ooops, break over.

Sound of the moment: Instructor talking about dlls
Age of the moment: 10ish (in excitement over prospect of seeing L)

Why me?

Aaargh. Headache!

Ok, I think I know why: There’s a glare from the window in the monitor I’m working at and the projected image of the instructor’s desktop is clear as mud. I don’t think my eyes are taking too kindly to this – hence, is my guess, the headache.

Sound of the moment: Sorry Mama (Eminem, it was on in the canteen)
Age of the moment: 3 (I want my mummy – ironic, considering the song stuck in my head)

Filling the old brain up

I’m on a course today (on a break right now) – getting a bit of input on QBE Vision, the Visual Basic-like programming language. Probably need a bit of input, too – it’s been ages since I did anything much in Visual Basic. Well, ages in this business means more than six months, at least with a brain like mine – leaks like a sieve. Actually, that’s the wrong metaphor, a leak gives teh impression that the information is semi-irredeamably lost. My brain is more like a library (what other metaphor would I use?) – the information is in there somewhere, but once it hasn’t been checked out for a while, a book get’s relegated to the archives in the basement, sometimes never to see light of day again. And sometimes a book gets put back in the wrong spot and is lost for weeks, months or years, until I go to look for something just which happens to have its right spot next to this wrong spot, and dislodge the misplaced volume and wealths of knowledge I didn’t know I had with it.

Rambling…

Break over.

Sound of the moment: something from Grease, I think, but I can’t quite put my finger on it
Age of the moment: 25 (back to when I first started really programming)

IKEA

I have had a glimpse of the new catalogue. The new kitchens are not thrilling, but one of them might actually work better for what I have in mind than any of the old ones.

Laying your hands on the new IKEA catalogue is a big deal. Seriously. You will all think I’m mad (well, I expect you all think I’m mad already anyway), but I have kept the last 6 years’ worth of IKEA catalogues. Not only that, in those 6 years I have moved (counts on fingers) 7 times. And 4 of those catalogues are British. Which means I’ve paid £5 / 1 cubic foot x volume of 4 IKEA catlogues to bring them back to Norway…

And yet, for all the excitement: every year the new catalogue is looked forward to with eager anticipation. And every year it arrives, and turns out to be a disappointment. Why? Well, you see, in August 1996 I was sharing a flat with J in Trondheim (or, rather, she was sharing her flat with me, as I was renting a room from her). The 1997 IKEA catalogue arrived in the shops (you can get it at Narvesen in Norway when it’s just out – if you live in Oslo you get it in the mail, though), we paid our 10 kr (just over a dollar) and took it home. After having passed it back and forth over the table in the living room (“Just look at that!”) for a whole evening, the next day saw us at Narvesen again, ready to fork out for another copy so that we could have one each. We spent a happy few days (weeks, months?) each sitting in her favourite spot in the living room, browsing. The quiet was interrupted at intervals with: “Check out the rug on page 176” or “Did you notice the legs on that wardrobe on page 234?” Pure bliss.

And so, every year we wait with baithed breath for August to come around. And every year we gingerly open the catalogue and start browsing. And every year the woeful cry is the same: “It’s nowhere near as good as the 1997 edition!”

Maybe it wasn’t the catalogue. Maybe it was just the setting; good friends in comfy chairs sharing architectural plans for mansions in the clouds furnished throughout with good, solid and just cool enough for us, IKEA designs. I don’t know.

What I do know is that when I get my own copy this year and have had the time to look at it for more than I few seconds, I will turn on my computer, and if J is logged on, MSN messenger will convey, with a sigh: “It’s nowhere near as good as the 1997 edition!”

Music in my head: 24 hours from Tulsa (yes, I know, you’d like to know where that came from, wouldn’t you? Well, so would I, so: Tough.)